Adina Cook\u2019s teenage son was skateboarding one evening. He tried to jump 10 concrete stairs and landed smack-dab on his shoulder.<\/p>\n
Instead of rushing him to the emergency room, Cook, 52, called the family\u2019s doctor, Tracy Ragland, who met them at her office\u2014on her birthday, 45 minutes before her party.<\/p>\n
Ragland got the shoulder back into place and dispensed muscle relaxants and pain medicines from her in-practice pharmacy. \u201cShe saved us probably at least a couple thousand dollars in medical costs\u201d versus an ER visit, Cook says.<\/p>\n
Hugh Stroth Jr., 69, another of Ragland\u2019s patients, had been trying to lose weight for a while. So Ragland suggested he meet with her monthly for weigh-ins and lengthy consultations. Over the next year, he lost 16 pounds and improved his blood pressure enough to cut his medication back.<\/p>\n
Many concierge physicians\u2014and their patients\u2014are in their 50s or older.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Insurance didn\u2019t cover any of this. Ragland, who runs OneFamilyMD in Crestwood, KY, doesn\u2019t accept it. She\u2019s what\u2019s called a direct primary care physician. People pay $50 to $100 a month, or $150 per family, to join her practice. In return, they receive unlimited office visits, 24\/7 access to Ragland, wholesale lab and medication prices, and even house calls and work calls if needed.<\/p>\n
Ragland is one of a growing number of doctors in the United States who runs a membership-based medical practice, a model of care that\u2019s grown exponentially since it started two decades ago. In recent years, the growth has been driven by doctors and patients frustrated with modern health care delivery. Many of them\u2014both the physicians and the people they treat\u2014are in their 50s and older. They remember an era before mounting insurance regulations and shrinking appointment times. Nostalgia for those good ol\u2019 days is part of what membership practices are banking on.<\/p>\n
The membership trend worries some experts and thrills others. This model of care is poised to alleviate the United States\u2019 primary care crisis\u2014or send it reeling into the deep end, depending on whom you talk to.<\/p>\n
How We Got Here<\/strong><\/p>\n
In 1996, Americans were struggling with skyrocketing health care costs and government attempts to stymie the growth. Much-derided HMOs were booming. These insurance plans were meant to help reduce health care costs, but they set strict guidelines for patients and doctors, including limitations on which doctors they\u2019d cover. Old-fashioned health care, in which the doctor and patient were solely in charge, was going by the wayside.<\/p>\n
When MD2<\/sup> (pronounced \u201cMD squared\u201d) came along that year, the national reception was less than warm. Launched by two doctors in Washington state, this new type of practice, dubbed \u201cconcierge medicine,\u201d charged an annual fee of about $13,200 per person, or $20,000 per couple, for exclusive, personalized care. Many people saw it as elitist and downright unfair.<\/p>\n
But in 2000, MDVIP launched as a more affordable concierge model, and the industry started growing. MDVIP is now one of the largest concierge franchises in the country. Its average membership fee is $1,800 a year.<\/p>\n
In a 2005 report, the Government Accountability Office identified just over 100 concierge practices. Estimates of current practice numbers range from 6,500 to 12,000\u2014with thousands more doctors contracting with at least some of their patients.<\/p>\n
How It Works<\/strong><\/p>\n
In membership medicine, patients pay a monthly, quarterly or yearly fee to join a medical practice. In return, they typically receive unlimited access to their physician\u2014phone calls, texts, emails, video calls. They get long, often same-day doctor appointments and additional perks, such as thorough coordination of care with specialists and free or low-price tests and lab work.<\/p>\n
There are two main practice models: concierge medicine and direct primary care. In general, concierge practices accept insurance, are more expensive and offer more services. Direct care practices, which are also called direct pay, don\u2019t accept insurance. (\u201cConcierge medicine\u201d is also sometimes used as an umbrella term for both types of practice.)<\/p>\n
Independent research on membership medicine is scant so far. The typical fee seems to be about $1,000 to $3,000 a year. Direct care models skew toward the cheaper end because they don\u2019t accept insurance. These doctors have less paperwork and don\u2019t have to hire staff members solely to help them comply with insurance rules.<\/p>\n
Patient Praise<\/strong><\/p>\n
Membership medicine is often touted as a return to old-fashioned health care. Those were the days when doctors, instead of cost-focused third parties, owned their own practices. The days when physicians didn\u2019t have to keep patient visits to 15 minutes or less because insurance would only pay so much, and they had to make time for all that paperwork anyway.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn the old days, you really had the time to address every problem when the patient came in. You didn\u2019t have to hurry them or skip things and make them come back,\u201d says internist Steven Mickley, who started practicing medicine in the 1970s. Nowadays, \u201ca lot of doctors just refer out to some other subspecialist because they don’t have time to deal with it.\u201d Mickley, who practices with two other doctors at Glenville Medical Concierge Care in Greenwich, CT, transitioned to concierge medicine in 2015.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe want people to think of us as having a doctor in the family.\u201d
\n–Bruce Jung, MD<\/p><\/blockquote>\nIn membership medicine, doctors are reimbursed the same no matter how many problems they address at once. And appointments often last 30 to 40 minutes.<\/p>\n
Such practices maintain about a fourth of the patient load of traditional primary care practices\u2014around 200 to 500 patients, according to an informal poll conducted by Concierge Medicine Today<\/em> (though these numbers may skew low because some respondents likely have young, still-growing practices).<\/p>\n
Older patients dealing with multiple medical issues often especially appreciate the extra time, says Bruce Jung, a family physician who runs The Doc Shoppe, a direct primary care practice in Corbin, KY. For example, cutting yearly visits down from 12 to two, which he suggests is sometimes possible, saves people who use wheelchairs headache, time and expense. Plus, brief to nonexistent waiting-room times can cut down on germ exposure, which is good because the immune system weakens with age. Some practices offer house calls when necessary.<\/p>\n
One of the most gushed-over perks patients cite is doctor accessibility. Nights, weekends, holidays\u2014the doctor is always in, sometimes precluding the need for an urgent care center or expensive emergency room.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe want people to think of us as having a doctor in the family,\u201d Jung says. \u201cThey know they can call us when they feel they need to because we\u2019d much rather take care of things sooner rather than later.\u201d<\/p>\n
While recovering from shoulder-replacement surgery in the hospital, Patricia Vitula Mundt\u2019s 94-year-old mother was in excruciating pain. \u201cWe were just constantly pushing the button\u2014it\u2019s time for her pain meds\u2014and she\u2019s crying, and 20 minutes later we might get someone in there,\u201d Mundt recalls.<\/p>\n
But Mundt and her mom were patients of Ragland\u2019s, at OneFamilyMD in Kentucky. Ragland texted Mundt to see how her mom was doing. When she learned what was going on, Ragland called the nurses\u2019 desk to address the problem. The next day, she went to the hospital to check on things in person.<\/p>\n
Ragland also provides occasional everyday caregiver support, in the form of advice-giving. \u201cIt\u2019s just been wonderful that I can email her and text her right away, because Mom\u2019s blood pressure goes up and down,\u201d Mundt says. \u201cI\u2019m not an experienced caregiver. Sometimes I don\u2019t understand\u2014like if her blood pressure goes up very high\u2014what I can do.\u201d<\/p>\n
If membership medicine continues to grow, will it exacerbate the doctor shortage?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Even with all this accessibility, doctors say they aren\u2019t overwhelmed with calls. \u201cI\u2019ve been doing this now for almost three years, but I\u2019ve only been called twice between midnight and 6:30 in the morning,\u201d Jung says. He establishes mutual accountability and respect upfront. \u201cMy agreement with my patients states that they can drop me at any time for any reason, and I can dismiss them at any time for any reason,\u201d though he notes that he gives them time to find a new physician.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe have not had to have a conversation with any patients about ending the arrangement except for one patient who was rifling through our lab cabinets in a quest for narcotics,\u201d he says, adding that his practice doesn\u2019t store narcotics anyway. \u201cWe have dismissed a few patients for lack of payment, but that is a pretty standard and common situation in any medical practice.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Effect on the Doctor Shortage<\/strong><\/p>\n
By the year 2020, the United States will have a shortage of 20,400 primary care physicians, according to a 2013 report from the government\u2019s National Center for Health Workforce Analysis. Causes include population aging, population growth and the fact that more people have health insurance because of the Affordable Care Act.<\/p>\n
One partial remedy the government has come up with is to encourage the use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants as primary care providers. But that\u2019s not good enough for many patients, who want to see their doctor. That\u2019s another perk of membership medicine: patients usually get to see the physician they\u2019re contracted with.<\/p>\n
Yet some industry experts worry about those who can\u2019t afford memberships. Membership doctors see fewer patients, after all, so if membership medicine continues to grow, will it exacerbate the doctor shortage?<\/p>\n
Proponents say that\u2019s unlikely. They argue that membership medicine could actually help alleviate the shortage by keeping doctors happier and in medicine longer.<\/p>\n
At her busiest while practicing traditional medicine, Ragland had about 2,200 patients on her roster. She was burned out and constantly behind, an oft-repeated complaint from primary care physicians. \u201cWith each new law and regulation that was supposed to address problems with our health care system, it just created more and more layers of bureaucracy that just made it harder and harder,\u201d she says.<\/p>\n
\u201cI was about to retire early from medicine and go to the family farm, and now I can honestly say, I could do this until I\u2019m an old lady.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Cost<\/strong><\/p>\n
One obvious downside to membership medicine is the additional cost to patients. No matter the benefits and discounts, many people find they can\u2019t afford to join a membership practice. So when a beloved doctor transitions, long-time patients are often hurt, angry and frustrated.<\/p>\n
When Ragland transitioned in 2015, reactions from her then-1,400 regular patients were mostly positive, but some were \u201cdownright mean,\u201d she says. Unhappy patients felt abandoned and said they couldn\u2019t afford the fees. Her small town has a median household income of $80,000. She held meetings and helped people find other doctors. Fewer than 300 patients initially joined the practice. More joined later.<\/p>\n
Jung\u2019s town has a median household income of just $33,000. He feels a spiritual calling to practice in a community that isn\u2019t rich, but it\u2019s been challenging. \u201cI\u2019m [only] at 350 members, and I have been doing this for almost three years now,\u201d he says. His monthly membership fee is $50 to $75 per person or $150 per family. Routine lab tests and some other common services are included.<\/p>\n
Research has yet to prove whether membership medicine leads to better health outcomes.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
It\u2019s common for membership doctors to dedicate about 10 percent of their practices to discounted or free services. Even so, some traditional doctors and industry experts see membership models as unfair, elitist and potentially discriminatory.<\/p>\n
But proponents argue that there\u2019s the potential for patients to save more money than they spend. More frequent, personalized, prevention-focused doctor visits could mean reduced medications, hospital stays and visits to specialists. Easy access to the doctor may lead to fewer urgent care and emergency room visits. Even insurance premiums can go down if patients switch to high-deductible plans and use membership care to fill the gap. With the current dearth of independent research, most of these money-saving aspects are still speculation.<\/p>\n
Where membership medicine really gets complicated is on the topic of insurance. In a nutshell, here are three things to keep in mind:<\/p>\n
\n
- Maintaining insurance is still recommended. <\/strong>Even though direct care practices don\u2019t accept insurance, experts recommend having a high-deductible policy for expensive things not covered in the membership, such as hospitalizations.<\/li>\n
- Medicare has its own rules. <\/strong>Many membership doctors treat patients who have Medicare. Some of these doctors\u2014especially in direct care\u2014have \u201copted out\u201d of Medicare, a legal option that prohibits the use of benefits for most of the doctors\u2019 services but still allows benefits to be used for outside services the doctor orders, such as labs and hospitalizations.<\/li>\n
- Membership fees are out-of-pocket.<\/strong> They don\u2019t even apply to insurance deductibles and can\u2019t usually be paid from a health savings account (HSA) or flexible savings account. (The proposed Primary Care Enhancement Act<\/a> could allow for paying direct care fees from an HSA if it ever gets out of committees.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Before joining a practice, ask how specialist referrals, hospital admissions and prescriptions will work with whatever type of insurance you have.<\/p>\n
Who Benefits Most<\/strong><\/p>\n
At just 20 years old, membership medicine still carries a lot of controversy and questions.<\/p>\n
There\u2019s the long-expressed concern that it could lead to a two-tiered health system, in which poorer people are shut out of the premier slots. But not as often brought up is the question of favoritism. Might a membership system favor younger, healthier patients over older people or those with chronic illness? Even now, it\u2019s common for practices to charge older people higher membership fees than younger ones.<\/p>\n
And, while the traditional fee-for-service system can allegedly lead to overtreatment and rising costs, what happens when practices don\u2019t make money on tests and procedures\u2014or when they include them as-needed in the memberships? Could that incentivize some doctors to provide less care than warranted, swinging the pendulum too far back?<\/p>\n
For these reasons and more, it\u2019s a good idea to interview the doctor before joining a membership practice. Get a feel for the physician\u2019s personality, bedside manner, expertise and trustworthiness before making the commitment.<\/p>\n
Research has yet to prove whether membership medicine leads to better health outcomes. More time with the doctor may sound great in theory, but does it actually help? That said, Mickley, the concierge internist in Connecticut, where the median household income is $135,000, names two groups of people who he believes tend to benefit the most from membership medicine: younger people with bad health habits who need intensive preventive care and advisement, and people with chronic, complicated problems who need lots of follow-up.<\/p>\n
But there are also plenty of membership patients who don\u2019t fall into those categories. \u201cI\u2019m thinking long-term,\u201d says one of Mickley\u2019s patients, 76, who declined to be named. She joined the practice because she\u2019d been a patient of Mickley\u2019s for about 10 years when he transitioned to concierge care, so she already knew she \u201cadored\u201d him as a doctor. \u201cWe don\u2019t know what our health care needs are going to be [going] forward. To have somebody that you can trust over the long term\u2014it\u2019s worth the cost, knowing that they\u2019re going to be there for you.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mickley, like many membership-based doctors, now has a waiting list to get into his practice.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Adina Cook\u2019s teenage son was skateboarding one evening. He tried to jump 10 concrete stairs and landed smack-dab on his shoulder. Instead of rushing him to the emergency room, Cook, 52, called the family\u2019s doctor, Tracy Ragland, who met them…<\/span><\/p>\n